IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON


negligence premised on Cove’s duties under the RLTA.” Majority at 28. The majority also notes that Cove’s “common law claims were based on premises liability, not the implied warranty of habitability.” Majority at 21 n.9. Nevertheless, the majority engages in an extensive analysis of the implied warranty of habitability.

  • File type: PDF
  • File size: n/a
  • File name: 973253.pdf
  • Source: www.courts.wa.gov

PDF DOWNLOAD:


PDF PREVIEW:


RELATED FILES: